Resultados de la búsqueda

1. Library Resource

   

   Land Governance and Gender

   The Tenure-Gender Nexus in Land Management and Land Policy

   Artículos de revistas y libros

   Noviembre, 2021

   Etiopía, Mozambique, Rwanda, Lesotho, Ghana, México, China, Alemania

   Tierra y Género

   Administración de tierras

   Política agraria

   Ordenación de tierras

   This book delivers new conceptual and empirical studies surrounding the design and evaluation of land governance, focusing on land management approaches, land policy issues, advances in pro-poor land tenure and land-based gender concerns. It explores alternative approaches for land management and land tenure through international experiences. Part 1 covers Concepts, debates and perspectives on the governance and gender aspects of land. Part 2 focuses on Tenure-gender dimensions in land management, land administration and land policy.

2. Library Resource

   

   Detailed timeline: Lesotho

   Companion to Land Portal Lesotho country narrative

   Informes e investigaciones

   Abril, 2021

   Lesotho

   Indígenas y Derechos comunales sobre la Tierra

   Tierra y Seguridad Alimentaria

   Tierra y Género

   Conflictos por Tierra

   Administración de tierras

   Registro de tierras

   Derecho consuetudinario

    

   A detailed chronology of historical and political developments and land related  issues in Lesotho. This detailed timeline accompanies the country profile of Lesotho, also published by Land Portal.

3. Library Resource

   

   Gender, authority and the politics of land in Lesotho

   Informes e investigaciones

   Enero, 2017

   Lesotho

   Tierra y Género

   Administración de tierras

   Política agraria

   Derechos de propiedad

   Mujeres

   This DPhil dissertation  explores the logic, methods, and outcomes of a U.S. government- sponsored land reform in Lesotho, Southern Africa. The reform was part of a $363 million grant from the Millennium Challenge Corporation to the Kingdom of Lesotho that funded a sweeping change. Instead of local chiefs administering and allocating land, the power shifted to bureaucrats and landholders, who received leasehold titles to their land.