Evidence shows that women can benefit from having individualised land rights formalized in their names. However, similar evidence is not available for formalization of land rights that are based on collective tenure. Studies have estimated that as much as 65 percent of the world’s land is held under customary, collective-tenure systems. Improving tenure security for land held collectively has been shown to improve resource management and to support self-determination of indigenous groups.
Resultados de la búsqueda
Mostrando ítems 1 a 9 de 12.-
Library ResourceInformes e investigacionesEnero, 2020Etiopía, Uganda, Perú, Indonesia
-
Library ResourceArtículos de revistas y librosNoviembre, 2018Serbia, Nepal, Marruecos, Guatemala, Filipinas, Uganda, Albania, Omán, Perú, Azerbaiyán, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, Colombia, Camboya, Congo, Argentina, Sierra Leona, Tanzania, China, México, Kenya
Goal 5 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” recognizes the fundamental role of women in achieving poverty reduction, food security and nutrition.
-
Library Resource
Evidence from 33 Countries
Informes e investigacionesMarzo, 2019Marruecos, Túnez, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Camerún, Namibia, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Liberia, Níger, Nigeria, Senegal, Costa Rica, Honduras, México, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, Camboya, Indonesia, Tailandia, Viet Nam, Jordania, Reino UnidoThis report uses household-level data from 33, mostly developing, countries to analyse perceptions of tenure insecurity among women. We test two hypotheses: (1) that women feel more insecure than men; and (2) that increasing statutory protections for women, for instance by issuing joint named titles or making inheritance law more gender equal, increases de facto tenure security.
-
Library Resource
Evidence from 33 Countries
Informes e investigacionesMarzo, 2019Marruecos, Túnez, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Camerún, Namibia, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Liberia, Níger, Nigeria, Senegal, Costa Rica, Honduras, México, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, Camboya, Indonesia, Tailandia, Viet Nam, Jordania, Reino UnidoA deeper look at what the results of the 33 wave 1 and 2 countries show about urban land tenure security. This report compliments the Prindex Comparative Report by focusing on a specific aspect of land and tenure insecurity.
-
Library ResourceInformes e investigacionesMarzo, 2019Marruecos, Túnez, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Camerún, Namibia, Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Liberia, Níger, Nigeria, Senegal, Costa Rica, Honduras, México, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, Camboya, Indonesia, Tailandia, Viet Nam, Jordania, Reino Unido
Property rights are a cornerstone of economic development and social justice. A fundamental way of understanding the strength of property rights is through citizens' perceptions of them. Yet perceptions of tenure security have never been collected at a global scale.
-
Library ResourceMultimediaMarzo, 2019Marruecos, Túnez, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, Benin, Ghana, Níger, Nigeria, México, Bolivia, Colombia, Camboya, Indonesia, Viet Nam, Jordania, Reino Unido
Wave 2 country infographics in one document. Countries include: Benin, Bolivia, Cambodia, Colombia, Ghana, Indonesia, Jordan, Kenya, Malawi, Mexico, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda, United Kingdom and Vietnam
-
Library ResourceInformes e investigacionesDiciembre, 2015Kenya, Islas Marshall, Pakistán, Nauru, Uganda, Indonesia, Australia, Canadá, Islandia, Sierra Leona, Costa Rica, República de Corea, México, Noruega, Camboya
Session: Tenure & Fishing Rights 2015
-
Library ResourceArtículos de revistas y librosDiciembre, 2016Angola, Fiji, Honduras, Nepal, Zambia, Gambia, Burkina Faso, China, Namibia, Indonesia, Australia, Bolivia, Congo, Guinea, Malawi, Níger, Mozambique, Liberia, Uganda, India, Togo, Kenya
Desde las décadas de 1970 y 1980, la forestería comunitaria ha ido adquiriendo cada vez más popularidad, a partir del concepto de que las comunidades locales, cuando se les conceden suficientes derechos de propiedad sobre los bosques colectivos locales, pueden organizarse de forma autónoma y crear instituciones locales a fin de reglamentar el uso de los recursos naturales y manejarlos de forma sostenible.
-
Library ResourceArtículos de revistas y librosDiciembre, 2014Indonesia, Nepal, México, Uganda, Viet Nam, Guatemala
This publication is a result of a close collaboration between FAO and RECOFTC - the Centre for People and Forests. Many colleagues from both the FAO and RECOFTC as well as other training and tenure experts have provided useful comments and suggestions over the course of developing the materials. This module is designed for training involving a mix of participants interested in contributing to more effective forest tenure policy and programmes.
-
Library ResourceArtículos de revistas y librosDiciembre, 2006Bangladesh, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Perú, Indonesia, Ghana, Venezuela, Guyana, Pakistán, Colombia, Mozambique, Jordania, Costa Rica, Filipinas, Sudáfrica, Nicaragua, Malasia, Uganda, Botswana, India, China, México, Brasil
The present paper seeks to cover the key issues, trends, constraints, challenges, knowledge gaps and policy options on a range of dimensions of land access. Land access is broadly defined as the processes by which people individually or collectively gain rights and opportunities to occupy and utilise land (primarily for productive purposes but also other economic and social purposes) on a temporary or permanent basis.
Búsqueda en la Biblioteca de Tierras
A través de nuestro sólido motor de búsqueda, puede explorar cualquier elemento de los más de 64.800 recursos rigurosamente seleccionados en la Biblioteca de la Tierra. Si desea obtener una visión general de lo que es posible, siéntase libre de examinar la Guía de búsqueda.