Search results
Showing items 1 through 9 of 22.-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1999Iceland
-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1992Estonia
-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1992Lithuania
-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1998Latvia
-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1999Finland
-
Library ResourceJanuary, 1937Ireland
-
Library Resource
Volume 10 Issue 3
Peer-reviewed publicationMarch, 2021Estonia, RussiaThis study explores how local communities reflect on institutional frameworks and protected area governance in two national parks (NPs) with similar nature values in Estonia and Russia, and aims to understand the role of value systems in these interactions. It is based on 50 in-depth interviews with a broad range of stakeholders, and a desktop analysis of relevant regulation and plans.
-
Library ResourceReports & ResearchDecember, 2018Norway
Continued high population growth in already densely populated rural areas in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa makes it harder for youth to choose agriculture as their main source of income. We investigate whether near landless youth can still access rented land as a complementary source of income. We utilize a unique data set of rural youth that have been allocated rehabilitated communal land to form formalized business groups for joint business activity. They rely on complementary sources of income and land renting is one of these.
-
Library Resource
Land Use Policy Volume 91
Peer-reviewed publicationFebruary, 2020China, Norway, Russia, United States of AmericaUnderstanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored.
-
Library Resource
Land Use Policy Volume 72
Peer-reviewed publicationMarch, 2018China, Norway, Russia, United States of AmericaLand use decision making requires knowledge integration from a wide range of stakeholders across science and practice. Many participatory methods and instruments aiming at such science-practice interaction have been developed during the last decades. However, there are methodological challenges, and little evidence neither about the methodological applicability and practicability under diverse socio-political conditions nor about their dynamics. The objective of this paper is to offer some insights on the design and implementation of reasonable science-practice interaction.
Land Library Search
Through our robust search engine, you can search for any item of the over 64,800 highly curated resources in the Land Library.
If you would like to find an overview of what is possible, feel free to peruse the Search Guide.