Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Community Organizations International Land Coalition
International Land Coalition
International Land Coalition
Acronym
ILC
Network

Location

Italy

The International Land Coalition (ILC) is a coalition of civil society and intergovernmental organizations promoting secure and equitable access to and control over land for poor women and men through advocacy, dialogue and capacity building.

Members:

Michael Taylor
Sandra Apaza
Elisabetta Cangelosi
Annalisa Mauro
Silvia Forno
Dunia Mennella
Rukshana Nanayakkara

Resources

Displaying 161 - 165 of 261

‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?

Policy Papers & Briefs
Agosto, 2013
África
América Latina e Caribe
Ásia

Large-scale land acquisitions are increasing in pace and scale, in particular across parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Weak governance and poor land use planning mean that commercial ‘land grabs’ often damage biodiversity as well as dispossessing people from customary rights and livelihoods. Land can also be ‘grabbed’ for ‘green’ purposes, triggering conflicts that undermine potential synergies. Expanded state protected areas, land for carbon offset markets and REDD, and for private conservation projects all potentially conflict with community rights.

‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?

Policy Papers & Briefs
Agosto, 2013
África
América Latina e Caribe
Ásia

Large-scale land acquisitions are increasing in pace and scale, in particular across parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Weak governance and poor land use planning mean that commercial ‘land grabs’ often damage biodiversity as well as dispossessing people from customary rights and livelihoods. Land can also be ‘grabbed’ for ‘green’ purposes, triggering conflicts that undermine potential synergies. Expanded state protected areas, land for carbon offset markets and REDD, and for private conservation projects all potentially conflict with community rights.

‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?

Policy Papers & Briefs
Agosto, 2013
África
América Latina e Caribe
Ásia

Large-scale land acquisitions are increasing in pace and scale, in particular across parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Weak governance and poor land use planning mean that commercial ‘land grabs’ often damage biodiversity as well as dispossessing people from customary rights and livelihoods. Land can also be ‘grabbed’ for ‘green’ purposes, triggering conflicts that undermine potential synergies. Expanded state protected areas, land for carbon offset markets and REDD, and for private conservation projects all potentially conflict with community rights.

‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?

Policy Papers & Briefs
Agosto, 2013
África
América Latina e Caribe
Ásia

Large-scale land acquisitions are increasing in pace and scale, in particular across parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Weak governance and poor land use planning mean that commercial ‘land grabs’ often damage biodiversity as well as dispossessing people from customary rights and livelihoods. Land can also be ‘grabbed’ for ‘green’ purposes, triggering conflicts that undermine potential synergies. Expanded state protected areas, land for carbon offset markets and REDD, and for private conservation projects all potentially conflict with community rights.

‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?

Policy Papers & Briefs
Agosto, 2013
África
América Latina e Caribe
Ásia

Large-scale land acquisitions are increasing in pace and scale, in particular across parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Weak governance and poor land use planning mean that commercial ‘land grabs’ often damage biodiversity as well as dispossessing people from customary rights and livelihoods. Land can also be ‘grabbed’ for ‘green’ purposes, triggering conflicts that undermine potential synergies. Expanded state protected areas, land for carbon offset markets and REDD, and for private conservation projects all potentially conflict with community rights.