Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Library Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: The contribution of existing protected areas

Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: The contribution of existing protected areas

Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: The contribution of existing protected areas

Resource information

Date of publication
december 2009
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201301638654
Pages
1639-1646

To be effective, reserve networks should represent all target species in protected areas that are large enough to ensure species persistence. Given limited resources to set aside protected areas for biodiversity conservation, and competing land uses, a prime consideration for the design of reserve networks is efficiency (the maximum biodiversity represented in a minimum number of sites). However, to be effective, networks may sacrifice efficiency. We used reserve selection algorithms to determine whether collections of existing individual protected areas in Canada were efficient and/or effective in terms of representing the diversity of disturbance-sensitive mammals in Canada in comparison to (1) an optimal network of reserves, and (2) sites selected at random. Unlike previous studies, we restricted our analysis to individual protected areas that met a criterion for minimum reserve size, to address issues of representation and persistence simultaneously. We also tested for effectiveness and efficiency using historical and present-day data to see whether protected area efficiency and/or effectiveness varied over time. In general, existing protected areas did not effectively capture the full suite of mammalian species diversity, nor are most existing protected areas part of a near-optimal solution set. To be effective, Canada's network of reserves will require at minimum 22 additional areas of >2700km². This study shows that even when only those reserves large enough to be effective are considered, protected areas systems may not be representative, nor were they representative at the time of establishment.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Wiersma, Yolanda F.
Nudds, Thomas D.

Publisher(s)
Data Provider
Geographical focus