Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Community Organizations Mokoro Land Rights In Africa
Mokoro Land Rights In Africa
Mokoro Land Rights In Africa
Data aggregator

Location

106-108 Cowley Road
Oxford
United Kingdom
Working languages
English
Affiliated Organization
Non Governmental organization

We are an international development consultancy working t

Mokoro is pleased to host the ’Land Rights in Africa’ site as a contribution to the land rights dialogue and related debates. This website was created in January 2000 by Robin Palmer, and was originally housed by Oxfam GB, where Robin worked as a Land Rights Adviser. A library of resources on land rights in Africa – with a particular focus on women’s land rights and on the impact of land grabbing in Africa – the portal has been well received by practitioners, researchers and policy makers, and has grown considerably over the years. Since 2012, Mokoro has been hosting and maintaining the site.

 

The views expressed on the Land Rights in Africa site as well as the publications hosted there, are those of the authors and do not represent those of Mokoro. Wherever possible, we link to the source website of publications.

Members:

Resources

Displaying 1056 - 1060 of 1120

New Land Laws and Old Donors in Africa

Reports & Research
april, 2000
Africa

Series of slides presented at a talk to the Royal African Society covering land tenure in Africa: common features; book outline; West Africa; land commissions, national land policies and land laws; implementation problems; Uganda Land Act 1998; land reform in South Africa 1994-9; tenure reform blocked in South Africa; conclusions; new approaches to land rights management; role of donors; Zimbabwe land invasions – different interpretations; Zimbabwe land chronology.

A Shaky Grip on Zimbabwe’s Moral High Ground

Reports & Research
april, 2000
Zimbabwe
Africa

A historical analysis of the current land invasion crisis, examining the chequered past of the white farmers. Contrasts the present situation with the eviction without compensation by whites of Chief Tangwenya and his followers. Examines the different interpretations by the British and Zimbabwean Governments of the agreement over land reached at Lancaster House in 1979. Argues that the present media coverage lacks historical perspective and is doing the country a disservice. There are more questions needing to be asked about Britain’s role