Перейти к основному содержанию

page search

Library Community participatory landscape classification and biodiversity assessment and monitoring of grazing lands in northern Kenya

Community participatory landscape classification and biodiversity assessment and monitoring of grazing lands in northern Kenya

Community participatory landscape classification and biodiversity assessment and monitoring of grazing lands in northern Kenya

Resource information

Date of publication
декабря 2009
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201301832875
Pages
673-682

In this study, we asked the Ariaal herders of northern Kenya to answer “why, what and how” they classified landscape, and assessed and monitored the biodiversity of 10 km2 of grazing land. To answer the “why question” the herders classified grazing resources into 39 landscape patches grouped into six landscape types and classified soil as ‘warm’, ‘intermediate’ or ‘cold’ for the purpose of land use. For the “what question” the herders used soil conditions and vegetation characteristics to assess biodiversity. Plant species were described as ‘increasers’, ‘decreasers’ or ‘stable’. The decreaser species were mostly grasses and forbs preferred for cattle and sheep grazing and the increasers were mostly woody species preferred by goats. The herders evaluated biodiversity in terms of key forage species and used absence or presence of the preferred species from individual landscapes for monitoring change in biodiversity. For the “how question” the herders used anthropogenic indicators concerned with livestock management for assessing landscape potential and suitability for grazing. The anthropogenic indicators were related to soils and biodiversity. The herders used plant species grazing preferences to determine the links between livestock production and biodiversity. By addressing these three questions, the study shows the value of incorporating the indigenous knowledge of herders into classification of landscape and assessment and monitoring of biodiversity in the grazing lands. We conclude that herder knowledge of biodiversity is related to the use as opposed to exclusive conservation practices. This type of knowledge is extremely valuable to conservation agencies for establishing a baseline for monitoring changes in biodiversity in the future.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Roba, Hassan G.
Oba, Gufu

Data Provider
Geographical focus