Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Biblioteca A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy

A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy

A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy
Land Use Policy Volume 59

Resource information

Date of publication
Dezembro 2016
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
lupj:S0264837716302654
Pages
13

We propose a causal analysis framework to increase understanding of land-use change (LUC) and the reliability of LUC models. This health-sciences-inspired framework can be applied to determine probable causes of LUC in the context of bioenergy. Calculations of net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for LUC associated with biofuel production are critical in determining whether a fuel qualifies as a biofuel or advanced biofuel category under regional (EU), national (US, UK), and state (California) regulations. Biofuel policymakers and scientists continue to discuss to what extent presumed indirect land-use change (ILUC) estimates should be included in GHG accounting for biofuel pathways. Current estimates of ILUC for bioenergy rely largely on economic simulation models that focus on causal pathways involving global commodity trade and use coarse land-cover data with simple land classification systems. This paper challenges the application of such models to estimate global areas of LUC in the absence of causal analysis. The proposed causal analysis framework begins with a definition of the change that has occurred and proceeds to a strength-of-evidence approach that includes plausibility of relationship, completeness of causal pathway, spatial co-occurrence, time order, analogous agents, simulation model results, and quantitative agent–response relationships. We discuss how LUC may be allocated among probable causes for policy purposes and how the application of the framework has the potential to increase the validity of LUC models and resolve controversies about ILUC, such as deforestation, and biofuels.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Efroymson, Rebecca A.
Kline, Keith L.
Angelsen, Arild
Verburg, Peter H.
Dale, Virginia H.
Langeveld, Johannes W.A.
McBride, Allen

Publisher(s)
Data Provider