Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Community Organizations Center for Open Science
Center for Open Science
Center for Open Science
Acronym
COS
Non Governmental organization

Location

Center for Open Science
210 Ridge McIntire Road
Suite 500
2903-5083
Charlottesville
Virginia
United States
Working languages
inglês

Our mission is to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research.


These are core values of scholarship and practicing them is presumed to increase the efficiency of acquiring knowledge.


For COS to achieve our mission, we must drive change in the culture and incentives that drive researchers’ behavior, the infrastructure that supports their research, and the business models that dominate scholarly communication.


This culture change requires simultaneous movement by funders, institutions, researchers, and service providers across national and disciplinary boundaries. Despite this, the vision is achievable because openness, integrity, and reproducibility are shared values, the technological capacity is available, and alternative sustainable business models exist.


COS's philosophy and motivation is summarized in its strategic plan and in scholarly articles outlining a vision of scientific utopia for research communication and research practices.


Because of our generous funders and outstanding partners, we are able to produce entirely free and open-source products and services. Use the header above to explore the team, services, and communities that make COS possible and productive.

Members:

Resources

Displaying 6 - 10 of 447

A. Amarender Reddy, Sandra Ricart and Tim Cadman (2020)TRIBAL AND NON-TRIBAL FARMERS’ LAND RIGHTS AND FOOD SECURITY PROMOTION IN TELANGANA, SOUTH ASIA RESEARCH Vol. 40(1): 75–93

Reports & Research
Fevereiro, 2020
India

This article examines and compares the status of land rights and their impacts on agricultural productivity, food security and well-being in a set of tribal and non-tribal villages in Telangana. Based on an intensive field survey, the research confirms that tribals without formal land rights remain largely unable to benefit from government support and access to private institutions in terms of getting credit and farm extension, whereas in non-tribal villages, government organisations are pro-active in providing such support.

Drivers of global variation in land ownership

Reports & Research
Fevereiro, 2020
Norway

Land ownership shapes natural resource management and social-ecological resilience, but the factors determining ownership norms in human societies remain unclear. Here we conduct a global empirical test of long-standing theories from ecology, economics, and anthropology regarding potential drivers of land ownership and territoriality. Prior theory suggests that resource defensibility, subsistence strategies, population pressure, political complexity, and cultural transmission mechanisms may all influence land ownership.

LAND OWNERSHIP RULES FOR FOREIGNER

Reports & Research
Dezembro, 2019
Global

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji : (1) gambaran volume kasus yang ada, (2) mengetahui mekanisme terjadinya penguasaan tanah oleh warga negara asing dan (3) mengetahui sistem pengawasan dan pengendalian yang efektif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: (1) Inventarisasi data yang dilakukan di Kantor Pertanahan di 7 Lokasi penelitian menunjukkan penguasaan tanah oleh warga Negara Asing melalui Hak Pakai sangat rendah, dan hanya terdapat di Provinsi Bali.

Gotong royong masyarakat Indonesia menangani karhutla dikaitkan dengan teori Soekarno dan Aristoteles

Reports & Research
Novembro, 2019
Indonesia

Kebakaran hutan adalah terjadinya peristiwa terbakarnya hutan yang diakibatkan oleh aktivitas alam dan juga oleh aktivitas manusia itu sendiri. Kebakaran hutan yang melanda Indonesia yaitu di wilayah Kalimantan dan juga Riau diakibatkan oleh adanya kegiatan land clearing. Selain itu kebakaran hutan dan lahan juga dipicu karena adanya kekeringan panjang yang melanda Indonesia. Land Clearing adalah kegiatan pembersihan lahan yang dimulai dari pemotongan pohon, pembabatan ilalang, dan pembakaran sampai lahan siap untuk digunakan.

Quo Vadis, Indonesian Agrarian Reform?

Reports & Research
Outubro, 2019
United Kingdom

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles is widely praised as the great work of the Indonesian nation which is revolutionary, responsive and combines the undeniable combination of individualism and communalism. However, the achievement of these laws is not achieved and spending is more likely to fail due to normative and ideological reasons. This paper tries to bring the study of the law to a more empirical direction by using theories of public policy implementation.