Aller au contenu principal

page search

Community Organizations Forest Peoples Programme
Forest Peoples Programme
Forest Peoples Programme
Acronym
FPP
Non Governmental organization

Focal point

Valérie Couillard

Location

Mission

Forest Peoples Programme supports the rights of peoples who live in forests and depend on them for their livelihoods. We work to create political space for forest peoples to secure rights, control their lands and decide their own futures.

Goals

  • Get the rights and interests of forest peoples recognised in laws, policies and programmes
  • Support forest peoples to build their own capacities to claim and exercise their human rights
  • Counter top-down policies and projects that threaten the rights of forest peoples
  • Promote community-based sustainable forest management
  • Ensure equity, counter discrimination and promote gender justice
  • Inform NGO actions on forests in line with forest peoples’ visions
  • Link up indigenous and forest peoples’ movements at the regional and international levels

Members:

Resources

Displaying 46 - 50 of 53

Country Office 506681 Country office Lao

General

Transboundary Responsible Business supported by the Mekong Region Land Governance Program (MRLG) and Oxfam Hongkong (OHK) . The program is implemented with the objective of influencing private sector in the Mekong region in improving their land policies that will hopefully improve the land governance in the Mekong to benefit the family farmers in the region. MRLG Innovation Fund 2016-2017

TFSN Land Governance in Cambodia

General

The SDC identified four key criteria for the successful project include proposed project team, proposed intervention strategy, procedure and organization, and financial proposal. SDC compared ONL score to the winning bid and the average value. Most of the scores were lower than the average, except the financial proposal (4.3 compared to average 3.4). Specific lessons learnt: 1. The required CVs for the proposed project team were not given adequate attention till the last moment. 2. The intervention strategy was a little bit broad as it is regional project. 3. SDC should have been included as an actor on land governance in the project rather than donoronly.

Grass-root community voice on land issue

General

Through this project, CHRAC is specifically working on land issue to 1/ improve security of land tenure of community for livelihoodthrough urging for the effective land dispute resolution mechanisms, 2/ to strengthen the capacity of affected community activistsand NGO networks for joint advocacy efforts in addressing of land and housing rights issues and 3/ to increase the participation ofgeneral public and state authorities to support and take action to improve situation of land and housing rights in Cambodia. CHRAC will work in 7 provinces include Koh Kong, Kampot and Sihanouk Ville provinces and the northern-eastern region covers the provinces of Kratie, Strung Treng, Mondulkiri, Ratanakiri where there are very more development and business operation are going on and createa lot of violation and abuse to communities

Master's Degree Program in Urban and Regional Development(2022)

General

To enhance participants knowledge and experience in the field of urban and regional development including master planning land use planning real estate and housing development urban redevelopment and new town development

Objectives

To enhance participants knowledge and experience in the field of urban and regional development including master planning land use planning real estate and housing development urban redevelopment and new town development

TFSN Land Governance in Cambodia

General

The SDC identified four key criteria for the successful project include proposed project team, proposed intervention strategy, procedure and organization, and financial proposal. SDC compared ONL score to the winning bid and the average value. Most of the scores were lower than the average, except the financial proposal (4.3 compared to average 3.4). Specific lessons learnt: 1. The required CVs for the proposed project team were not given adequate attention till the last moment. 2. The intervention strategy was a little bit broad as it is regional project. 3. SDC should have been included as an actor on land governance in the project rather than donoronly.