Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Biblioteca An Example of a Gentrification: Unintended Consequences of an in Situ Rehabilitation Project in Ankara

An Example of a Gentrification: Unintended Consequences of an in Situ Rehabilitation Project in Ankara

An Example of a Gentrification: Unintended Consequences of an in Situ Rehabilitation Project in Ankara

Resource information

Date of publication
Junho 2016
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
DOAJ:228fc1bccce14f3b98a4f319d5c177ab
Pages
20
License of the resource

This article is about an early example of gentrification processes in Ankara, the capital of Turkey. A unique form of the gentrification process is examined using a case study of a small inner-city neighborhood on Koza Street through the monitoring of the area between 1998 and 2016, and giving voice to both the gentrifiers and gentrified. Almost ninety percent of the population in the area was displaced despite the inclusionary principles of an in situ Rehabilitation Project which has led to a large scale transformation of the physical space of
the street. The study includes four field studies conducted at different time intervals (1998, 2001, 2004, 2009) and a follow-up visit (2016) to the neighborhood, to critically assess the progression of gentrification in Turkey through its phases. Even though gentrification usually refers to the middle class invasion of urban land originally inhabited by the less privileged, our case reveals the effects of successive modes of a gentrification process which starts as an in situ rehabilitation project of a squatter prevention area initiated by a social democratic municipality with the “participation of local groups”, and turns into “gentrification by choice” in the successive years in the shadow of “Third Way” values. What is currently happening could be regarded as “gentrification by force” following urban renewal. In our case, however, the line between the two major components of gentrification, i.e., the “gentrifier” and the “gentrified”, seems to have become ambiguous, which calls for a further analysis of Turkey’s unique political and spatial dynamics.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Reyhan Varlı Görk
Helga Rittersberger Tılıç

Geographical focus