Skip to main content

page search

Library Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and Minimum Distance to Mean Classifiers in Preparing Land Cover Map (A Case Study: Isfahan Area)

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and Minimum Distance to Mean Classifiers in Preparing Land Cover Map (A Case Study: Isfahan Area)

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and Minimum Distance to Mean Classifiers in Preparing Land Cover Map (A Case Study: Isfahan Area)

Resource information

Date of publication
October 2011
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:DJ2012069611
Pages
253-264

Land cover maps derived from satellite images play a key role in regional and national land cover assessments. In order to compare maximum likelihood and minimum distance to mean classifiers, LISS-III images from IRS-P6 satellite were acquired in August 2008 from the western part of Isfahan. First, the LISS-III image was georeferenced. The Root Mean Square error of less than one pixel was the result of registration. After creating false color composite and calculating transformed divergence index, the images were classified using maximum likelihood and minimum distance to mean classifiers into six categories including river, bare land, agricultural land, urban area, highway and rocky outcrops. The results of classification showed that the dominant land cover type is urban area, occupying about 6821.1 ha representing 38.86% of total area. The accuracy of maximum likelihood and minimum distance to mean classifiers was obtained using error matrix and Kappa analysis. According to the results, the maximum likelihood algorithm had an overall accuracy of 94.93% and the minimum distance to mean method was 85.25% accurate. The results illustrate that the maximum likelihood method is superior to minimum distance to mean classifier.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

A. Soffianian
M. A. Madanian

Data Provider