Skip to main content

page search

Library Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities

Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities

Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities

Resource information

Date of publication
November 2011
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201500217204
Pages
898-906

This study examines the experiences and opinions of a “public” which became involved in a government driven comprehensive land use and natural resource planning exercise in British Columbia, Canada during the 1990s. While it is generally assumed to be an inherently good thing, or at least a politically necessary thing, to involve the public in natural resources or land use planning, few studies have examined the experiences of the public or examined perceived failures from the public's perspective. This study examines British Columbia's CORE and LRMP planning processes, their successes and failures, as determined by residents of six communities that participated in these processes. Lessons on improving public processes from the viewpoint of that public are discussed.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Booth, Annie
Halseth, Greg

Publisher(s)
Data Provider
Geographical focus