Skip to main content

page search

Library Transitions in agro-pastoralist systems of East Africa: Impacts on food security and poverty

Transitions in agro-pastoralist systems of East Africa: Impacts on food security and poverty

Transitions in agro-pastoralist systems of East Africa: Impacts on food security and poverty

Resource information

Date of publication
September 2013
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
handle:10568/33792
License of the resource

Climate-induced livelihood transitions in the agricultural systems of Africa are increasingly likely. There is limited evidence on what such transitions might look like. We carried out fieldwork in 12 sites in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda to understand changes in farming systems in the recent past, and to test the hypothesis that sedentary farmers in zones that may become warmer and drier in the future may be forced to increase their reliance on livestock vis-à-vis cropping in the future. We estimated the contribution of crop and livestock activities to incomes, food security and poverty. Householders were asked how to adapt farming in the future. We found no direct evidence for the hypothesised extensification of production across study sites. Human diets have changed considerably in the last 40 years, as cropping has been taken up by increasing numbers of pastoral households, even in marginal places. Maize and legumes predominate, but some householders are increasing their crop and diet diversity, particularly in locations with annual rainfall higher than 800 mm. At all sites people want more livestock. Food insecurity is common at all sites with an annual rainfall of 800 mm or less, and critical levels are seen at sites with <700 mm. Households are self-sufficient in securing adequate dietary energy from food production in 7 of the 12 sites, all with rainfall higher than 800 mm. Although many householders have some knowledge about drought-tolerant crops, few cultivate millet, sorghum and cassava. Policies aimed at increasing the consumption of cassava, sorghum, millet and pigeon pea could be highly beneficial for future food security in the region. Vulnerability in the drier locations is already high, and policies should support safety nets and market and infrastructural development. Households in the wetter areas need to manage risk and to increase crop productivity. A critical requirement is knowledge transfer concerning the growing and utilisation of unfamiliar and untraditional crops.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Nganga, S.K.
Jones, P.G.
Herrero, Mario
Rufino, Mariana C.
Mutie, Ianetta
van Wijk, Mark T.
Thornton, Philip K.

Data Provider
Geographical focus