Why Land Reform Will Continue to be One of South Africa’s Biggest Problems | Land Portal | Securing Land Rights Through Open Data

Land redistribution through just and equitable means remains contentious in the South African political and judicial landscape. Under the apartheid rule, the distribution of land was aligned to race, with the minority white population allocated about 90% of arable and habitable land, while the majority black population was allocated the minute remainder, mainly in the homelands. Transitioning from an apartheid to a democratic state brought about the human rights laden Constitution which contains section 25 – the right property. Essentially, the provision calls for ‘expropriation for public purpose or public interest’ and expressly prohibits the ‘arbitrary deprivation of property’. Opposition parties like the Economic Freedom Fighters (‘EFF’) have taken a different stance – as they find the provision to be fundamentally lacking in addressing the glaring inequalities between the races where land is concerned – calling for ‘expropriation without compensation’. As a result and to remain attractive and viable to the voting population, the ruling African National Congress (‘ANC’) conceded to the amending the Constitution along these lines.

Since the democratic dispensation, the government has had more land transferred to the black population as “Land reform, with the assistance of the market, has, therefore, moved us closer to the 30% target than what is commonly believed…”. Efforts for land redress have not been without challenges. They have been delayed by corruption and the general lack of expeditious administration. In as much as gains have been made to redistribute the land back to the black population, the government has not devised sustainable methods to fully exploit the land for economic advancement. Similarly, the process compensation for land claims has been tardy. A considerable amount of citizens in the homelands have no real rights over the land as it is communally owned and much under the control of traditional leadership structures.

The progressive realization of land ownership to address past prejudicial and unjust laws requires commitment and political will to do.

Share this page

Copyright © Source (mentioned above). All rights reserved. The Land Portal distributes materials without the copyright owner’s permission based on the “fair use” doctrine of copyright, meaning that we post news articles for non-commercial, informative purposes. If you are the owner of the article or report and would like it to be removed, please contact us at hello@landportal.info and we will remove the posting immediately.

Various news items related to land governance are posted on the Land Portal every day by the Land Portal users, from various sources, such as news organizations and other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. The copyright lies with the source of the article; the Land Portal Foundation does not have the legal right to edit or correct the article, nor does the Foundation endorse its content. To make corrections or ask for permission to republish or other authorized use of this material, please contact the copyright holder.