Skip to main content

page search

Library Land reform in South Africa : Beneficiary participation and impact on land use in the Waterberg District

Land reform in South Africa : Beneficiary participation and impact on land use in the Waterberg District

Land reform in South Africa : Beneficiary participation and impact on land use in the Waterberg District

Resource information

Date of publication
December 2017
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
NARCIS:wur:oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/526122
Pages
10

National challenges of food insecurity and unemployment in South Africa prompted an increase in expectations for agricultural land acquired through land reform programmes to make meaningful contributions. Embedded in these expectations is the need for understanding the situation in reformed farms. This study reviewed policies and literature on land reform, and analyzed beneficiary participation in reformed farms and the impact of land reform on land use in land restitution and land redistribution farms in the Waterberg District Municipality. Data were collected through individual surveys, key informants interviews and stakeholder workshop. Beneficiary participation levels were significantly lower in restitution farms (18% per farm) than in redistribution farms (65% per farm). The changes in land redistribution policy over time resulted in significant differences in beneficiary participation among land redistribution models, with participation levels increasing with time. Land redistribution model SLAG had the lowest beneficiary participation level (19% per farm) while the latest model PLAS had the highest (100% per farm). The changes in land redistribution policy over time resulted in significant differences in extent of land used among land redistribution models, though the trend was not systemic. On average, redistribution farms under SLAG and LRAD2 models used ≤70% of the farm land, while farms under LRAD1 and PLAS models used more than 90% of the farm land. The research approach used in this study found similar results in beneficiary participation to those in literature where case studies approach was used in restitution farms. On the contrary, in redistribution farms the research approach resulted in findings that differed from case study literature and revealed the needs for representative sample and time if conclusive recommendations were to be reached.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Netshipale, Avhafunani J.
Oosting, Simon J.
Raidimi, Edzisani N.
Mashiloane, Majela L.
Boer, de, Imke J.M.

Geographical focus